Sunday, 3 April 2011

Disqualification Penalties in Golf














No handicap on score card - Disqualification!

In an earlier blog I covered the subject; 'Is it a One Sroke Penalty or Two Strokes?' Just as important, are the circumstances in which a player can be disqualified, the penalty for the most serious breaches of the Rules. Note that in match play, disqualification may apply either to the hole being played or to the match itself.

Disqualification is the prescribed penalty for the following offences:

  1. Not playing holes in the correct order (Rule 1-1 – stroke play only).
  2. Deliberately influencing the position or the movement of a ball (Rule 1-2).
  3. Deliberately deflecting or stopping a ball (Rule 1-2).
  4. Agreement to waive any Rule or penalty (Rule 1-3).
  5. Playing from the next tee without holing out on the previous green (Rule 3-2 – stroke play only).
  6. Playing a second ball and not subsequently reporting the facts to the Committee (Rule 3-3).
  7. Refusing to comply with a Rule affecting the rights of another competitor (Rule 3-4).
  8. Making a stroke with a non-conforming club (Rule 4-1).
  9. Deliberately changing the playing characteristics of a club during a stipulated round (Rule 4-2).
  10. Applying ‘foreign material’ to the face of a club (Rule 4-2).
  11. Playing with a club that has been rendered non-conforming by damage other than in the normal course of play (Rule 4-3b & c).
  12. Failure to declare excess club (i.e. more than 14) out of play immediately upon discovery, or using an excess club after the declaration during the remainder of the stipulated round (Rule 4-4). 
  13. Using a non-conforming ball (Rule 5-1).
  14. Applying ‘foreign material’ to a ball (Rule 5-2).
  15. Declaring (match play) or recording (stroke play) a higher handicap than entitled to (Rule 6-2).
  16. Failure to record handicap on scorecard (Rule 6-2 - stroke play only).
  17. Failure to start at the time established by the Committee (Rule 6-3). (Amended 1st Jan 2012 to more than 5 minutes late).
  18. Failing to ensure that no more than one caddie is used at any one time, after being penalised for a breach of this Rule, during the remainder of the stipulated round (6-4).
  19. Failing to sign a score card (Rule 6-6).
  20. Signing an incomplete or incorrect score card (Rule 6-6).
  21. Unduly delaying play subsequent to receiving a penalty for the same offence from the Committee (Rule 6-7).
  22. Discontinuing play without Committee approval (Rule 6-8).
  23. Practising on the course on the day of play (Rule 7-1 – stroke play only)
  24. Agreeing to play out of turn in order to gain an advantage (Rule 10.2c – stroke play only).
  25. Using a non-conforming tee (Rule 11-1).
  26. Deliberately moving the tee-markers because the player feels that they are too close together, too far back, aimed in the wrong direction or some similar reason and not replacing them before anyone makes their stroke (Decision 11-2/2b).
  27. Playing from outside the teeing ground and not subsequently correcting the error (Rule 11-4).
  28. Using an artificial device or unusual equipment (Rule 14-3).
  29. Playing a wrong ball and not subsequently correcting the error (Rule 15-3 – stroke play only).
  30. Playing from the wrong place and not subsequently correcting the error (Rule 20-7 – stroke play only).
  31. Agreeing not to lift a ball that might assist any other player (Rule 22-1 – stroke play only).
  32. Playing out of turn in foursomes (or threesomes) and not subsequently correcting the error (Rule 29-3).
  33. Not identifying which partner’s gross score is to count in four-ball stroke play (Rule 31-3).
  34. Committing a breach of etiquette that the Committee considers serious (Rule 33-7).
 Good golfing,



Two years ago, I combined with Andy Brown of GolfSwingSecretsRevealed.com to produce an audio CD, ‘99 Golden Nuggets to Demystifying the Rules of Golf’. Andy has made the first chapter of this CD, ‘Before Commencing a Round’ available as a free MP3 format audio file. Click here for details on how to download his gift. You can find out much more about the contents of ’99 Golden Nuggets to Demystifying the Rules of Golf’ including some glowing testimonials from users at this link.

62 comments:

tonydell said...

Last year at my club we had a 36 hole foursomes competition. My playing partner and I participated in the event and were required to submit our scorecard in after completion of the first 18 holes. It was a shotgun start for the field and as we passed the clubhouse we handed our card in for the first 18. On completion of the 2nd 18 we returned to the clubhouse for drinks and presentations with most groups finishing about the same time. Soon after we ( my playing partner and myself) were advised by one of the organisers that we have been disqualified for having not put our handicaps onto the scorecard for the 2nd 18 holes played. This was a rude shock to me and I considered it a bit mean and felt hard done by here. Do you happen to have a view on this please Barry?

Barry Rhodes said...

Tonydell,

Tony,

Unfortunately, I have to concur that the Committees decision was the correct one. Part of Rule 6-6 states;

In any round of a handicap competition, the competitor must ensure that his handicap is recorded on his score card before it is returned to the Committee.

As there were two rounds for the foursomes competition the handicaps must be recorded on both score cards.

Regards,

Barry

tonydell said...

Barry

Thank you for your reply.

I want to pick at the semantics of this on this occaision.

If the term had been "In every round" or "In all rounds" then this is clear cut - must do.

But the term "In any round" I interperet in this instance to be at least once in any one of the round(s) ( whether it be a single or multiple round competition).

(I must state that I had not scrutinised the wording of this rule in this light until now. Also, must state that in the competition in question we had inadvertadley forgot to include our handicaps, and not deliberately not included them for the sake of minimally comlying with the rule)

Do you concur with my interpretation?

Regards

Tony

Barry Rhodes said...

Tony,

No, I interpret Rule 6-6 differently. If there are 4 rounds in a competition there are four cards to return. If the player does not sign their card in any of those four rounds they incur the penalty of disqualification. Just think of the problems that a Committee would face if there were 100 competitors over four rounds and many players only entered their handicap on their first round score card.

Barry

Anonymous said...

I was playing a stroke play tournament and my ball went OB I hit a provisional (also OB) and found my first and played it as a lateral hazard out of instinct (moved the ball two club lengths from the OB and dropped) I finished the hole fine. I now realize I made a mistake and should be penalized. What is the correct course of action? Disqualification or 2 strokes?

I did not sign my score card until reviewing with the officials, which was when they said I was disqualified.

Is this reasonable?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Yes, the Committee had no option but to disqualify you. The only way that you could complete the stipulated round in a strokes competition was to return to the tee for your 5th stroke. The fact that you played from a wrong place and did not correct the mistake before teeing-off at the next teeing ground incurred the penalty of disqualification. Rules 27-1b, 20-5 and 20-7c.

Barry

carlota said...

Wat happen wen 2 Players submitted their score cards...only realized wen prize presentation why she wasnt called as the Winner...later,found out both players didnt exchanged cards,so players card's scored was in the wrong column,A player even signed as Marker on her card...wat is the decision.....

Barry Rhodes said...

Carlota,

If I understand your question correctly, Decision 6-6d/4 rules that the Committee should accept both score cards and change the names on the cards. It is a long Decision, so here is the link;

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Decision-06/#6-6d/4

Barry



Barry

Anonymous said...

Someone in an 18 hole stroke play played 6 under their handicap but did not sign the book before play and was therefore disqualified. They then thought they would go up .1 but they were cut. They thought this was incorrect. What is your take on this?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

This is really a question on handicap systems, which I am not an expert on. However, in my opinion, if the player was not entered in the competition (the transgression that he was disqualified for) his score card should not have been taken into account for handicapping purposes. However, I stress that there are many different handicapping systems around the world and some may have policies that do not concur with this opinion.

Barry

Anonymous said...

I played in a compettition at the weekend and shot net 67. Put my card in the box and realised it wasnt signed. I asked the club if i could have the key to the box to get my card out, they said no this was strictly forbidden is this correct?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Yes, the Rules have been correctly applied. Decision 6-6c/1 is relevant (especially the last paragraph);

Q.Rule 6-6c prohibits alterations to the score card "after the competitor has returned it to the Committee." When is a score card considered returned?

A. This is a matter for the Committee to decide and it will vary depending on the nature of the competition. The Committee should designate a "scoring area" where competitors are to return their score cards (e.g., in a tent, a trailer, the golf shop, by the scoreboard, etc.). When it has done so, Rule 6-6c should be interpreted in such a way that a competitor within the "scoring area" is considered to be in the process of returning his score card. Alterations may be made on the score card even if the competitor has handed the score card to a member of the Committee. He is considered to have returned his score card when he has left the scoring area.

Alternatively, the Committee may require a competitor to return his score card by placing it in a box and thus consider it returned when it is dropped into the box, even if he has not left the scoring area.


Barry

tony z said...

Your list is great, especially as I have an exam coming up.

However I have problem with Rule 1-1 being used to DQ someone for not

playing holes in correct order. I agree with the decision, but could you explain your reasoning.

Surprisingly the decisions book is no help

I would have thought 3-1 covered it if anything, although there is no mention of a DQ, but certainly 11-5 would hammer the player - wrong teeing ground, not corrected

Barry Rhodes said...

Tony Z,

The first Decision for Rule 1-1 is the key to this disqualification;

Decision 1-1/1: Q. Two players on the 8th hole play their approach shots to the 8th green. They agree to tee off at the 9th hole and then putt out on the 8th green. This is to avoid having to walk back up a hill to the 9th tee and to save time. What is the ruling?

A. In match play, the players are disqualified under Rule 1-3 for excluding the operation of Rule 2-1 by failing to play the stipulated round.

In stroke play, the competitors are disqualified under Rule 3-2 for failing to hole out on the 8th hole before making a stroke from the 9th tee.


Barry

Sid Chaliha said...

Dear Barry,
In a stableford tournament, a competitor scores a 5 on a par 4 - his marker marks it as 4. the competitor asks him to correct the score which he does. They submit their cards at the end of the round and leave for the main clubhouse.
Later on the competitor finds that he has been disqualified, he reason given being the score recorded on that particular hole was ilegible.
Now, when the competitor had submitted his card, there was neither anyone from the committee nor a representative to accept his card or offer him a chance to clarify his card. Morever, the competitor had also marked his stableford score for the hole correctly.
Can the committee disqualify him citing 'illegible score' in one hole for this?

Barry Rhodes said...

Sid,

The direct answer to your question is, "Yes the Committee can disqualify the player, as their decision is final", Rule 34-3. No doubt they will say that the competitor should have checked that his card was legible before signing it and returning it to them. However, I believe that most Committees would make an effort to check the score for the hole before taking the disqualification route. For example, comparing the score with the points recorded (if they were calculated on the score card), comparing with any other place that the score was entered (e.g. a computer system), contacting the marker (who also had to sign the card) to decipher his hand writing, or contacting another fellow competitor that was playing in the same group for his recollection of the player's score on the hole.

Unfortunately, the disqualification penalty cannot be rescinded after the competition has closed, but that does not stop the Committee from making amends.

Barry

Anonymous said...

I have just been disqualified from TWO competions, where I would have won a prize, for not having my handicap on the scorecard. It was dissapointing, and was due to my lack of knowledge of the rules. However, it does seem harsh given we have computer entry for all competitions, where you enter your ID and confirm your name and handicap, and again confirm your score at the end of play, also confirming name and handicap. I assumed that I had done what I needed to do?
It seems to me that there should be a reminder in these scoring systems to check for scorecard completion on top of computer confirmation?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Computer systems play no part in the Rules of Golf for an obvious reason. They are probably not used in a majority of golf competitions throughout the world. The Rules of Golf are exactly the same in whichever country the game is played. Rule 6-1 states that players are responsible for knowing the Rules and Rule 6-2b states that players must ensure that their handicap is recorded on their score card before it is returned to the Committee.

There are positives resulting from this episode. You will probably never again return a score card without your signature and handicap entered on it and others may also have learned from your misfortune.

Please keep reading this blog for other useful information on protecting your scores by having a better understanding of the Rules.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi, the first on your list of reasons for disqualifications is not playing the holes in the correct order (Stroke Play) Rule 1-1.
I can't find that mentioned under Rule 1-1 and if it is correct, why doesn't it apply to shot gun starts.
Cheers
Max

Anonymous said...

With reference to #20 signing an incorrect card
causing disqualification.

Roberto DiVensenzo sp? signed for a score which was higher than the actual one and there was no disqualification.

Barry Rhodes said...

Max,

The disqualification penalty for not playing holes in the correct order is explained in the very first Decision on the Rules, Decision 1-1/1;

Q.Two players on the 8th hole play their approach shots to the 8th green. They agree to tee off at the 9th hole and then putt out on the 8th green. This is to avoid having to walk back up a hill to the 9th tee and to save time. What is the ruling?

A.In match play, the players are disqualified under Rule 1-3 for excluding the operation of Rule 2-1 by failing to play the stipulated round.

In stroke play, the competitors are disqualified under Rule 3-2 for failing to hole out on the 8th hole before making a stroke from the 9th tee.


Your second point regarding shot-gun starts is clarified in the Definition of Stipulated round;

The “stipulated round’’ consists of playing the holes of the course in their correct sequence, unless otherwise authorized by the Committee.

Barry

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

When a player and their marker sign, a score card containing a score for a hole that is higher than was actually scored that is the score that stands. In the eyes of the Committee it is not an 'incorrect' score. The penalty only applies if the player returns a score card with a lower score than was actually scored.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi Barry
A couple of players playing in a stableford competition decided to pass a hole because a group in front were playing slow, moved onto the next hole and continued the round, then came back to play the missed hole. What penalties should be applied for not playing a stipulated round correctly, disqualification or only the hole missed. It enabled them to play the rest of the round at their own pace comfortably, while others had to wait and pass the slower players. rgds Mick

Barry Rhodes said...

Mick,

As the players purposely chose not to play the 'stipulated round' they should be disqualified under Rule 1-3. Definition of Stipulated Round;

The “stipulated round’’ consists of playing the holes of the course in their correct sequence, unless otherwise authorized by the Committee. The number of holes in a stipulated round is 18 unless a smaller number is authorized by the Committee.

Rule 1-3 states;

Players must not agree to exclude the operation of any Rule or to waive any penalty incurred.
Penalty for breach of Rule 1-3:
Stroke play – Disqualification of competitors concerned.


It does not matter that it was a Stableford competition, as the players are disqualified from the competition and not just the hole.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Barry,
We had a group decide that they wanted to be at the front of the field for a shotgun start and so teed off the 8th tee, instead of their assigned 5th tee.
Even though they played the holes in correct numerical order, they did not begin their round at the tee the committee had assigned to them. Are they disqualified?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Although shotgun starts are not covered in the Rules of Golf I have no doubt that these players should have been disqualified. First, they were not on the tee they were allocated at their starting time (Rule 6-3); second they played from the wrong teeing ground (Rule 11-4); and third they did not play the stipulated round, as required by the Committee (Rule 3-1).

Barry

Anonymous said...

Question. Can I play the holes on a course in random order and still submit my score for handicap purposes? Example. If the players in front of me are too slow, and I want to skip certain holes, and go back to them later, thus, trying to play my round at a better pace, is this round still valid for my handicap? All rules are still being followed. I'm just simply playing the 18 holes not in the correct order of the club. Thanks.

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Unlike the Rules of Golf, handicapping systems vary all over the world and I don't pretend to be an expert on them. However, I would be very surprised if any handicapping authority would permit a score to count for handicapping purposes unless it was a stipulated round. Part of the Definition of Stipulated Round states that it consists of playing the holes of the course in their correct sequence, unless otherwise authorised by the Committee.

Barry

Anonymous said...

After a match play round was concluded,the scorecard was turned in showing 10-3. The real score was 9-4.
Is there any impact on the outcome?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

There is no requirement to keep a score card in match play. The match is won when one side leads by a number of holes greater than the number of remaining holes (Rule 2-3).

Neither 10-3 or 9-4 is a valid result in match play. If one side had won 9 holes and the other had won 4 holes the result could have been 5 and 4 (i.e. 5 holes up and only 4 holes remaining.) If all 18 holes were played (i.e. 5 holes were halved) the match was won at some earlier point and the remaining holes were inconsequential.

Barry

ggregg said...

Is there any rule about notification of disqualifacation? We were told we were leading a competition but when results were published we were not on board. When I asked how we did as I knew our score was higher than the winning score I was told we were disqualified as I player played off wrOng handicap.

Barry Rhodes said...

Ggregg,

No there is no Rule that a Committee must notify a competitor about their disqualification, prior or subsequent to announcing the result of the competition, though in my opinion it is a basic courtesy to do so.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi,

Where there are prizes for gross scores in a competition would a competitor be disqualified from the gross score prize if he failed to put his handicap on the score card?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Part of Rule 6-2b states;

If no handicap is recorded on his score card before it is returned (Rule 6-6b), or if the recorded handicap is higher than that to which he is entitled and this affects the number of strokes received, he is disqualified from the handicap competition; otherwise, the score stands.

So, in gross competitions, which are not handicap competitions, a player is not disqualified for not entering a handicap on their score card.

Barry

M said...

Hi

Played a shotgun stableford strating from furtherest hole and we missed the announcement that unusual tee boxes were to be used. Midway through our second hole we realised our first had been from the wrong tee box. On completion we informed committee and 'cancelled' our scores for the first hole. Should we have been disqualified entirely or just for the wrongly played hole? Thanks

Barry Rhodes said...

M,

Because it was a Stableford competition you were disqualified for any hole that you did not play out from the correct teeing grounds (i.e. you scored no points on those holes). You should not have been disqualified from the whole competition, Rule 32-2.

Barry

Madeleine said...

hi,
I was playing in a friendly ladies competition at my club, i was not doing our teams scorecard so i did not notice this mistake: my partners did not write our handicap on our scorecard, but my question is was it our fault or is it the fault of the organizers. We were then disqualified from the competition, is this a bit extreme as it was only a friendly stableford competition???

Barry Rhodes said...

Madeleine,

In stroke play the competitor must ensure that their handicap is recorded on their score card before returning it at the end of their round. If no handicap is recorded on their card before it is returned, they are disqualified, Rule 6-6b.

The Rules of Golf are the same in a friendly Stableford competition as in any other!

Barry

Unknown said...

We have a computer at the golf course, and competitors normally enter the competition through the computer. I am of the understanding that currently, the Rules of Golf consider the computer a 'courtesy', and that as long as you indicate your intention of entering the competition in some way, prior to going out to play, you cannot be disqualified if you have not entered your intention specifically in the computer, or, having entered in the computer, being disqualified if you return your correctly marked and signed card, but not enter your score in the computer. Our club has indicated that competitors must enter through the computer, and will be disqualified if they do not enter the competition and return their cards in that manner. I believe that this is covered in the Rules of Golf (Dec. 6-6/b), but would like confirmation of whether I am interpreting this correctly or not.

Barry Rhodes said...

Unknown,

The Committee may certainly make it a Condition that competitors must enter a competition through a computer system. Anyone who does not comply has therefore not met with the requirements of entry and their score card cannot be counted.

I think that you are confusing the situation with Decision 6-6b/8, which rules that Committees may not make a Condition of Competition that requires a competitor to enter their score into a computer after their round.

Barry

Anonymous said...

WE HAVE JUST HAD A FOUR BALL BETTER BALL COMPETITION WHERE THE MARKER FAILED TO FILL IN pLAYER A OR PLAYER B ON THE SCORE CARD SO THE SCORE WAS ALL ON ONE LINE,SO YOU COULD NOT SEE WHICH PLAYER HAD RECORDED THE SCORE.ALL THE SCORES WERE CORRECT BUT COULD NOT BE CHECKED AS FAR AS THE DIFFERANT HANDICAPS WERE CONCERNED.
The players were alerted to this prior to entering the score in the computer and worked back through the card and all resigned the amended card.Are they allowed to do this?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

Providing the score card had not been returned to the Committee in the prescribed manner (e.g. by posting it in the competition score card box) then the card may be corrected, signed by one player and the marker, and returned to the Committee. However, if the score card had been returned it could not then be corrected, Rule 6-6c;

No alteration may be made on a score card after the competitor has returned it to the Committee.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi Barry. Great insight on the rules of golf.

In matchplay if the team sheets have been swapped over and a player subsequently realises their handicap is wrong. In this case the players handicap had gone out rather than down and it didn't change the order in which the team went out. What is the position in this case?

Thank you.

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

This situation is not covered by the Rules of Golf. However, there may be a Condition of Competition that rules on team lists; if not, then the Committee organising the competition should make the decision. In my opinion, in the circumstances that you describe, the player should be permitted to play off the lower handicap that was wrongly declared on the team sheet. The decision is more difficult in a situation where a higher handicap has been declared, but depending on how the error was discovered, I would probably permit the player to play their match of their correct, lower handicap for the sake of continuing good relations between the teams.

Barry

Anonymous said...

At the end of a comp, a player asked his playing partner to hand his card in. The card was handed over to the days official scorer, albeit not in the scorers office. The scorer noticed the player had not signed his card and gave it back saying "go and get the card signed" Is this correct or should the player have been disqualified?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,


The player should not have been disqualified. Decision 6-6c/1 shows us that alterations may be made on the score card even if the competitor has handed the score card to a member of the Committee. A player is considered to have returned his score card when he has left the scoring area.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Barry reference last question. the said player had never entered the clubhouse or the recording area. he sent his scorecard with his playing partner to be handed in. the card was sent out of the recording area to be altered (signed), does this make any difference to the decision

cheers for your help Dave P

Barry Rhodes said...

Dave P,

No, the card had not been 'returned', as it was not accepted by the official scorer, due to the lack of signature. In the same way that officials (and fellow competitors) are encouraged to prevent breaches of the Rules before they happen, Committee members are encouraged to ensure that score cards are properly completed before they are returned.

Barry

Anonymous said...

if a player fills the date in the handicap line and the handicap in the date line can he/she be disqualified

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

No, the Rules only require that the player's name, their full handicap and the gross scores for each hole are recorded on the signed score card when it is returned at the end of the round. It does not matter where the handicap is written, providing it is obvious that it is the player's handicap, though obviously it is more convenient for the Committee if it is entered in the area provided on the score card.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Barry,

In a match play competition, Player A mistakenly plays the wrong ball on a hole. He notices his error and notifies his opponent. They both believe he has incurred a two stroke penalty (as opposed to the loss of hole penalty he should have incurred). A then replays the shot and records a 6 including the two stroke penalty on his scorecard. His opponent also scores a six and the players believe the hole is halved.

The round concludes with A winning the match 3&1. They sign the card and turn it into the scorer.

Should A and/or B be disqualified for signing the incorrect total score (3&1)? Is A's score of 6 on the hole considered lower than his actual score - which disqualifies him from the match?

Finally, both A and B notified the committee, in passing, of the penalty incurred by A and their treatment of the situation. Neither player asked for a ruling because both believed a two stroke penalty was the correct assessment. They were merely recounting how unusual it was that A could incur the penalty and still halve the hole. The committee did not notice the error at the time. Would this have any affect on the questions above?

Thanks for your help - I'm totally stumped on this one.



Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

The result of the match stands. In match play, it is too late to make any claim concerning penalties incurred once a player has made a stroke at the following hole (Rule 2-5).

Unfortunately, you are still confusing stroke play Rules with match play. There are many differences and I refer you to my blog dated 27th March 2013. For example, players cannot be disqualified from a match play competition for signing for an incorrect score, as the Rules do not require a score card to be kept. It is up to the sides to agree on the score as they proceed through the match.

The Committee should certainly have been able to immediately confirm that the match result stands. Players (and Committees) are responsible for knowing the Rules (Rule 6-1) and the player that should have won the hole, as soon as their opponent played a wrong ball, should have known this.

Barry

Tim Park said...

Hi Barry, Recently in a 4BBB/Par event a marker only recorded the players result (i.e. +,- or 0) and not their score for each hole. The player signed the card and submitted it. Should the player be DQ'd? Is there any penalty for the marker? The players gross score was recorded correctly on the card they were marking. Thank you

Barry Rhodes said...

Tim,

Yes, the player should be disqualified for a breach of Rule 6-6a, as the gross score for each hole must be recorded on the score card. The player is responsible for returning a signed score card with all the gross score correctly recorded on that card.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi Barry,

A guy at my club played in a competition with another member, they both marked their own cards and just signed each others cards at the end of the round. Neither took a note of the other member's score. Is it essential to switch cards at the start of a round? Should they be Disqualified?

Many Thanks

David

Barry Rhodes said...

David,

Obviously, this is a situation which should be taken up by the Committee. There is no basis for the players to be disqualified, as they have each signed the other's score card, attesting its accuracy; for all we know they could have photographic memories, which enables them to remember all the gross scores of the other player, however unlikely this may seem. Having said that, they have not followed the part of Rule 6-6 that states,
After each hole the marker should check the score with the competitor and record it.

In my opinion, the Committee should definitely interview the players and require that they follow the recommendation of the Rule in future competitions.

Barry

Anonymous said...

In relation to the blog relating to skipping holes in a Stabelford resulting in disqualification, can you explain how the wording in the Decisions on the Rules 32.1/2 is applied? Does this not allow you to skip a hole?

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

I suspect you know that this question has been the subject of much discussion recently. A reply has now been received from a representative of the Ruling Bodies confirming that a player is not DQ’d for missing/omitting or not returning a score for holes in a Stableford competition.
The nature of Stableford is that it is permitted to omit holes. Decision 32-1/2 supports this.

Barry

Anonymous said...

Hi Barry
Love your web-site. I am querying rule 8-6. A person who fails to enter a qualifying competition in the required manner is deemed to have neither a score for the competition or a score for handicap purposes.
So if I do not swipe into computer prior to competition as stipulated, should I be swiped into competition by committe and immediately disqualified with 0.1 handicap penalty or is my card simply ignored and am I deemed to have never entered competition and no penalty? The 2 different scenarios could affect CSS and possibly prize structure. Thanks for you advice

Barry Rhodes said...

Anonymous,

This is not a Rules of Golf query (there is no Rule 8-6) and I do not profess to have any knowledge of handicapping systems, which vary greatly around the world. However, as a fellow golfer it seems to me that if you played a round of golf with fellow competitors entered in a competition, the Committee acted reasonably.

Barry

Barry

insey said...

Hi Barry
My partner &I DQ from a Winter s/ford comp last year (comp played over 6mth-one card submit per mth - best of 4) because I allowed my partner to complete 1 score card and she didnt incl date. book was signed. I accepted decision, the spirit of comp.My own resp-should have checked. the same player submit wrong date this year but they didn't disq. Comm rule players fill in own cards. under 33.5 Is this fair?

Barry Rhodes said...

Insey,

A note to Rule 33-5 states;

Note: The Committee may request that each competitor records the date and his name on his score card.

This would be a reasonable Condition of Competition for a competition that is played over several months. If this was the case for the competition that you had entered, the Committee would have been justified in disqualifying you for not entering a date, though in my opinion it would not have been be reasonable, as it seems that you had signed the entry book showing that you played on that day.

Obviously, I do not know why the Committee subsequently accepted a score card that did not have a date; perhaps that was for a competition that was only played over one day, which would be reasonable.

Barry